在帮助他人时加入社会联结
事实上,任何形式的亲社会行为都会增强真正的幸福感。与此同时,一些研究发现和社会联结有关的亲社会行为会带来某些特别的益处。在一项由加拿大西蒙弗雷泽大学所做的实验中,研究者送给参与实验的大学生每人10美元星巴克代金券。
这本身就已让人非常开心了。然而研究者发现,如何使用这些代金券会进一步影响这些同学的开心程度。有些人自己花掉了这张代金券,还有些人选择把它送人。但那些收获了最多快乐的同学的做法是将前两者结合:他们带上自己的朋友,用这张代金券给自己和别人埋单。
所以下回当你希望为别人做些什么的时候,记得增加一些社交体验在其中。别忘了,我们在前面曾提到过,那些和体验相关的礼物比物质类的礼物更好,因为它们当中融入了社会联结的经历。我的一位学生希望送给他的女朋友一份假期礼物,他本可以选择项链或者名牌鞋,但他没有,而是计划并实施了一场二人的自然探索之旅。“这份礼物为我们留下了许多美好回忆,令人至今难忘,”他如此说道,“我们在此起彼伏的山川间漫步,一路饱览了许多美丽的风景。又在海边美丽的树林中度过了难忘的一周,以欣赏壮美的日落作为旅途的终点。如今我们仍时常回味那次旅行,想起在远足之后享用的美味蓝莓派和冰激凌。”
他在开始规划旅程时,起初只是希望女朋友能为此开心。但就像那些带着朋友一起享用星巴克的学生一样,在之后的旅途中,他自己也得到了快乐。“送出这份礼物的意外之处在于,我自己也从中收获良多。这次旅行不但让我的女朋友惊喜不已,至今念念不忘,还让我有机会和她一起,度过了一段幸福难忘的时光。”
若我们只能通过一项指标去衡量一个人的幸福感,我们会选择他的社会联结程度。与他人的联结会带给你对未来的期待,对过去的美好回忆,并为你的身体健康、心理健康和智力发挥提供一个良好的支持系统。当你在计划如何使用自己的时间和金钱时,请记得创造一些机会和他人一起分享。哪怕是暂时没有足够的钱去买对方最喜欢的球队比赛的门票,或是去到那个心仪已久的目的地旅行,只要你愿意与人为善,帮助他人,并和别人分享你的经历,这些都能为你带来幸福感。一份带有社会联结的礼物绝对会是最好的礼物,无论对送出者还是收礼人而言,它都会让你们变得更加快乐。
Van Boven, L. & Gilovich, T., “To Do or to Have? That Is the Question,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003): 1193–1202.
Kemp, S., Burt, C.D.B., & Furneaux, L. “A Test of the Peak-End Rule with Extended Autobiographical Events,” Memory & Cognition 36 (2008):132– 38.
Ibid., 137.
Van Boven, L., Campbell, M.C., & Gilovich, T., “Stigmatizing Materialism:On Stereotypes and Impressions of Materialistic and Experiential Pursuits,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (2010): 551–563.
Howell, R.T. & Hill, G., “The Mediators of Experiential Purchases: Determining the Impact of Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Social Comparison,” The Journal of Positive Psychology 4 (2009): 511–522.
Dunn, E.W., Gilbert, D.T., & Wilson, T.D., “If Money Doesn’t Make You Happy, Then You Probably Aren’t Spending It Right,” Journal of Consumer Psychology 21 (2011): 115– 125.
Ibid., 120.
Cohen, S., Frank, E., Doyle, W.J., Skoner, D.P., Rabin, B.S., & Gwaltney,J.M., “Types of Stressors That Increase Susceptibility to the Common Cold in Healthy Adults,” Health Psychology 17 (1998): 214– 223.
Berkman, L.F. & Syme, L., “Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality: A Nine-Year Follow-Up Study of Alameda County Residents,” American Journal of Epidemiology 109 (1979): 186–204.
Ybarra, O. et al., “Mental Exercising through Simple Socializing: Social Interaction Promotes General Cognitive Functioning,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (2008): 248–259.
Ibid., 257.
Ybarra, O., Winkielman, P., Yeh, I., Burnstein, E., & Kavanagh, L., “Friends(and Sometimes Enemies) with Cognitive Benefits: What Types of Social Interactions Boost Executive Functioning?” Social Psychological & Personality Science 2 (2011): 253– 261.
Ibid., 256.
Dunn, E.W., Aknin, L.B., Norton, M.I., “Spending Money on Others Promotes Happiness,” Science 319 (2008): 1687– 1688.
Brooks, A.C. (2008). Gross National Happiness. New York: Basic Books.
Vinson, T. & Ericson, M., “The Social Dimensions of Happiness and Life Satisfaction of Australians: Evidence from the World Values Survey,” International Journal of Social Welfare 23 (2014): 240–253.
Paylor, J. “Volunteering and Health: Evidence of Impact and Implications for Policy and Practice,” London: Institute for Volunteering Research, 2011.
Nelson, S.K., Layous, K., Cole., S.W., & Lyubomirsky, S., “Do unto Others or Treat Yourself? The Effects of Prosocial and Self-Focused Behavior on Psychological Flourishing,” Emotion 16 (2016): 850– 861.
Ibid., 856.
Ibid., 859.
Sheldon, K.M., Boehm, J.K., & Lyubomirsky, S., “Variety Is the Spice of Happiness: The Hedonic Adaptation Prevention (HAP) Model,” in The Oxford Handbook of Happiness, eds. Boniwell, I. & David, S. (Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2012), 901– 914.
Ibid., 911.
Hardy, C.L. & Van Vugt, M., “Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (2006):1402– 1413.
Ibid., 1412.
Aknin, L.B., Dunn, E.W., Sandstrom, G.M., & Norton, M.I., “Does Social Connection Turn Good Deeds into Good Feelings? On the Value of Putting the ‘Social’ in Prosocial Spending,” International Journal of Happiness and Development 1 (2013): 155– 171.
